The complete facade compliance package — ITPs, product certificates, fire-engineer sign-off, and as-built records your insurer and certifier need to close the file.
An OC can spend six figures replacing combustible cladding, and still be unable to satisfy its insurer, discharge a fire safety order, or obtain a certifier's sign-off — because the compliance evidence was never assembled properly. The physical works and the paperwork are two separate deliverables, and the second one is what closes the file.
Facade certification and documentation is the structured compliance package that demonstrates, in the format insurers and certifiers expect, that the facade meets the NCC and that every step was inspected, tested, and verified. It is built as the works proceed — through inspection and test plans, hold-point sign-offs, and fire-engineer verification — not reconstructed from memory after handover.
At Atomic Projects, we treat the compliance package as a deliverable in its own right. Whether we delivered the cladding works or are documenting a facade to close out compliance, we assemble one clean, traceable package that gives your certifier, insurer, and the OC everything they need.
A complete package includes: product compliance certificates (CodeMark or ABCB-accepted data) confirming the installed cladding meets NCC fire performance requirements; the ITP with hold-point sign-offs and witness records; a non-conformance register showing all issues raised and closed; the fire engineer's compliance letter or report; zoned photographic as-built records of substrate, cavity, and interface details; and a maintenance manual for the installed system. Together these give the certifier and insurer a defensible evidence trail for the whole facade.
On-site inspection confirms a moment in time; the documentation package proves the whole sequence. A certifier can't issue sign-off, and an insurer generally won't reinstate cover, on the strength of a verbal confirmation that the works looked right. They need the traceable record — who inspected what, against which standard, and with what result — at each hold point. Without that assembled evidence, the OC has compliant works but no way to demonstrate compliance, which is where files stall.
In most cases, yes — our packages are structured to meet the evidentiary requirements of major Australian building insurers following facade and cladding remediation. Because requirements can vary between insurers, we recommend sharing the intended package structure with the insurer's assessor early, so any specific documents they need are captured before final handover rather than requested afterwards. This is particularly important where cover was previously loaded or declined over the cladding.
In limited circumstances, yes — for example where a facade needs its compliance evidence assembled or a certifier has requested documentation that was never compiled. However, the integrity of an ITP is strongest when the party documenting the works also owned their quality. Where the original records are incomplete, we're honest about what can be verified retrospectively versus what may require intrusive inspection or fire-engineer reassessment to substantiate.
When a facade has been remediated under a fire safety order, the issuing authority needs documented proof that the compliant end-state was achieved — typically the fire engineer's sign-off supported by product certificates, ITP records, and as-built documentation. The certification package assembles exactly that evidence in a submittable form, so the OC can apply to have the order formally discharged rather than leaving it live over an undocumented outcome.
Send photos, the engineer's report, or just the symptoms — whatever you've got. A registered builder reads it and calls you back. No call centre, no obligation.