A new facade is only watertight if weatherproofing is integrated across the whole envelope — every interface, penetration, and junction sealed as one system.
Windows, balconies, parapets, roof edges, service penetrations, movement joints, base-of-wall terminations — these are the points where water finds its way in. Replace the cladding but treat these junctions as an afterthought, and the OC ends up with a compliant-looking facade that still lets water through within a few winters.
Weatherproofing integration is the discipline of designing and sealing the entire building envelope as a single continuous system — so the sarking, flashings, cavity drainage, membranes, and sealants all work together, not as disconnected details bolted on at the end. It is a whole-of-envelope approach, and it is what separates a facade that merely passes inspection from one that stays dry for its full service life.
At Atomic Projects, we plan weatherproofing integration from the start of a cladding replacement programme, not the end. Every interface is mapped, every drainage path is designed to shed water, and every seal is tested before scaffold comes down.
Flashing detailing addresses individual junctions one at a time. Weatherproofing integration designs the entire envelope as one continuous system — so the sarking, cavity drainage, flashings, membranes, and sealants are coordinated to move water off the building as a whole. The difference shows up in the corners and transitions, where a junction-by-junction approach leaves gaps that a whole-envelope approach designs out. For an OC, it's the difference between a facade that passes and a facade that stays dry.
Because the drainage plane sits behind the panels. Once panels are fixed, the flashing geometry, sarking laps, and cavity drainage are locked in and can't be corrected without pulling the facade apart again. Planning the water path before works commence means the substrate, battens, cavity barriers, and flashings are all set up to drain correctly from the first panel. Retrofitting weatherproofing after the fact is how OCs end up paying twice.
The weatherproofing layer and the cavity fire barriers occupy the same cavity, so they have to be resolved together. The fire engineer specifies where cavity barriers sit; we integrate the sarking and flashings around those barriers so neither compromises the other. Done in isolation, waterproofing can breach a fire barrier or a fire detail can create a water trap. We coordinate both through shop drawings so the completed envelope satisfies weatherproofing and fire performance simultaneously.
The primary performance reference is AS/NZS 4284 (Testing of Building Facades), which sets the benchmark for weather resistance under simulated storm conditions. Weatherproofing design also draws on the NCC's waterproofing provisions and the cladding manufacturer's installation requirements. For each project we design details to satisfy these and, where required, coordinate with the fire engineer's specification so the envelope is compliant on every front.
We hose-test representative junctions to AS/NZS 4284 principles while scaffold is still in place and access is available, and we photograph and document every result. This testing is a mandatory hold point in our ITP — panels are not signed off, and scaffold does not come down, until the envelope has been proven and the evidence is in the QA record. The OC receives that evidence as part of the completion documentation.
Send photos, the engineer's report, or just the symptoms — whatever you've got. A registered builder reads it and calls you back. No call centre, no obligation.